This entry was posted on December 10, 2009 at 2:22 am and is filed under Blog posts. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
11 Responses to “Why aren’t dual flush valves the default choice in public bathrooms?”
Not just public bathrooms, but all bathrooms. Any bathroom installed in the 15 – 20 years in Australia has had a dual flush toilet. Having lived in the US the past six years, I know it’s not the case here…
A good idea gone wrong, I do hope they go extinct soon. They have the same at Harvard and it’s not uncommon to find floating bits of detritus from absent minded professors who pull the handle the wrong way.
It also too often requires a second flush, either because you didn’t pay enough attention the first time, or because it’s not at all obvious that you push DOWN for liquid waste if you used TP.
TMI? Apologies. But please lets make this horrible device go away.
If a device is used the wrong way it means first of all that the device has a badly designed user interface. It needs more time to learn using the device than an average user is willing to spend.
As mentioned by Beert Meert the ones I know too have a big button for big business and a small button for small business. That way people not caring for the details normally push the big button which is a safe default from a hygienic point of view.
Related – At my university, we used non-flush urinals. At first, it seems like a wonderful idea, particularly as we were going through one of the worst droughts of the century at the time. Then, it was revealed that while these urinals used no water, they required plastic filters that needed regular replacement. Permanent filters were barred by state law.
Thus, the university decreed them removed and replaced with low-water urinals.
I wonder how many years THESE will have to be used before before they’re replaced.